| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
- Blogroll (2)
- communication (74)
- easter (3)
- education (43)
- emotion (84)
- hearing (56)
- humor (35)
- interpretation (76)
- listen (52)
- prophet (4)
- religion (110)
- signs (19)
- stroke (40)
- technology (5)
- Uncategorized (20)
- wild guesses (68)
- 8. March 2010: THE STATE OF HEALTH CARE
- 5. March 2010: WORSHIP LEADER IS A PERVERT
- 4. March 2010: Testing a New Blog Editor
- 24. February 2010: NOT QUITE THE REAL THING
- 19. February 2010: IF ONLY I COULD REMEMBER
- 13. February 2010: RANDOM ACTS OF TOMFOOLERY
- 8. February 2010: THINGS ARE NOT GOING AS PLANNED
- 25. January 2010: THAT’S WHAT IT SAYS BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT IT MEANS BECAUSE IT MIGHT NOT WORK
- 17. January 2010: OBSERVING REALITY
- 12. January 2010: THE END OF MODERN CIVILIZATION
Blogroll
- (((Billy))) The Atheist
- An Apostate's Chapel
- Atheist Revolution
- Daylight Atheism
- Decrepit Old Fool
- Dispatches From the Culture Wars
- Forever In Hell
- Friendly Atheist
- God is for Suckers
- Greta Christina's Blog
- On Leaving Fundamentalist Christianity
- Pharyngula
- Spanish Inquisitor
- Stupid Evil Bastard
- The Invisible Pink Unicorn
- Unreasonable Faith
- Whatever
- You Made Me Say It
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- July 2006
THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS
Even the completely Christian christian in our little group of retail employees agreed that Oral Roberts was a conman. There’s no arguing that particular point, it is an unbiased fact. This guy could not leave it at that, however. He felt it was necessary to point out that Roberts was responsible for getting the word of god out to millions of people. God still used him in spite of his greed and excesses.
I almost started to argue that it was pathetic to think god wanted his word spread by false teachers.
Then I remembered this passage from the bible: “It is true that some preach Christ out of envy and rivalry, but others out of goodwill. The latter do so in love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the gospel. The former preach Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely, supposing that they can stir up trouble for me while I am in chains. But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.” (Philippians 1: 15 – 18) That’s the apostle Paul while he was in prison. (Emphasis mine)
As long as Christ is preached it doesn’t matter what the preacher’s motives are. The ends justify the means. It is the word of god. So my fellow employee was correct in his assessment of Roberts, he was a conman but he spread the word to millions so what does it matter.
I still think that’s pathetic but there I go again thinking I’m more moral than god.
I don’t suppose it would do any good to point out that the gospel Roberts preached was the “healing and prosperity” gospel which is not the same thing as the “salvation” gospel (entire denominations won’t have anything to do with each other over those differences.) I don’t suppose that pointing out the bible also says not to have anything to do with false teachers or anyone who brings some other gospel. If you let them in your house you share in their evil work. Seems like a blatantly huge contradiction to me.
I would have thought god had higher standards than that.
19. December 2009 at 17:28
I probably don’t need to tell you that this bit right here is where you made your first mistake.
20. December 2009 at 15:23
I had heard he died, someone will just take his place, or have they already?