| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Dec | Feb » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
- Blogroll (2)
- communication (74)
- easter (3)
- education (43)
- emotion (84)
- hearing (56)
- humor (35)
- interpretation (76)
- listen (52)
- prophet (4)
- religion (110)
- signs (19)
- stroke (40)
- technology (5)
- Uncategorized (20)
- wild guesses (68)
- 8. March 2010: THE STATE OF HEALTH CARE
- 5. March 2010: WORSHIP LEADER IS A PERVERT
- 4. March 2010: Testing a New Blog Editor
- 24. February 2010: NOT QUITE THE REAL THING
- 19. February 2010: IF ONLY I COULD REMEMBER
- 13. February 2010: RANDOM ACTS OF TOMFOOLERY
- 8. February 2010: THINGS ARE NOT GOING AS PLANNED
- 25. January 2010: THAT’S WHAT IT SAYS BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT IT MEANS BECAUSE IT MIGHT NOT WORK
- 17. January 2010: OBSERVING REALITY
- 12. January 2010: THE END OF MODERN CIVILIZATION
Blogroll
- (((Billy))) The Atheist
- An Apostate's Chapel
- Atheist Revolution
- Daylight Atheism
- Decrepit Old Fool
- Dispatches From the Culture Wars
- Forever In Hell
- Friendly Atheist
- God is for Suckers
- Greta Christina's Blog
- On Leaving Fundamentalist Christianity
- Pharyngula
- Spanish Inquisitor
- Stupid Evil Bastard
- The Invisible Pink Unicorn
- Unreasonable Faith
- Whatever
- You Made Me Say It
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- July 2006
THAT’S WHAT IT SAYS BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT IT MEANS BECAUSE IT MIGHT NOT WORK
I went with my wife to church today because she was going to sing a special. She did good. The pastor, however, didn’t.
His main topic was prayer with faith being a secondary reinforcement. Unfortunately for him his choice of verses quite clearly state that the prayer of faith WILL heal the sick. This does not fit in with his beliefs or the doctrines of his church so he was forced to add conditions and alterations to the verse to make it mean something it did not say. At the very least this is rather dishonest.
It’s also why it is no use trying to use logic and reason to refute these people; they are masters of making contrary statements fit their own preconceived notions by any means possible.
Part of his elaboration was that in order for god to be god there had to be mystery involved. Our minds are so petty that they can’t conceive the things of god. His will is a mystery, his reasons for our suffering go beyond our ability to understand. And since there is such mystery we can’t assume the prayer of faith will actually do what the bible says it will do. Why? Because we’re all sinners with tiny little pea brains.
Besides, it’s more about spiritual healing anyway.
What, may I ask, is spiritual healing? Seriously, go in any church and try to get someone to actually explain what your spirit is in comprehensible terms. I guarantee getting a straight answer is next to impossible. Get them to tell you what’s the difference between spirit and soul. If anyone has an answer it will be some variation of only the word of god can divide the two. It is one of god’s mysteries.
Let’s just go with a basic definition; your spirit or soul is that part of your consciousness that makes you you. Simple enough?
Now then let’s ask someone such as myself who has suffered brain damage what they think that means. Any small amount of research will show you that brain damage (injury, stroke, disease, drugs) can radically alter your personality. It can change what makes you you in such a way that you can no longer even recognize yourself. It can baffle other people so much that they will literally withdraw from you because they can’t comprehend how different you are.
If simple physical damage can change who you are and how you think how can there be some immaterial spirit being who is the real you? How could I go from a fired up christian fanatic to a complete unbeliever without even trying? I have a clearly defined dividing line between who I was before the stroke to who I am after. There’s no grey area. Faith was everything before and it’s nothing now.
Not that I just accepted that. No, I studied relentlessly to find an explanation. I studied different doctrines, church history, different philosophies; works I never would have looked at before. I looked to science and medicine and found out about brain damage and what it could do. I found actual, real, physical, natural explanations for what I was convinced was a spiritual problem. And I learned to cope with it.
I found the truth and the truth set me free.
The truth wasn’t the bible. It was cold, hard facts.
What I want to point out to people is simply this; if your faith and beliefs require you to add words or alter their meanings from your own sacred texts, then, obviously, your texts aren’t quite so sacred as you claim. You know the verse doesn’t work but you can’t admit that. So you throw in some mystery. You add some variable that allows you to fail so that you can claim god’s word didn’t fail.
If the bible was really the word of a real god it wouldn’t need such dishonest help.
Would it?
27. January 2010 at 21:46
Excellent post.
1. February 2010 at 01:20
It would if the god in question were a dishonest prick. A characterization which, if the god of the Bible were real, would fit the data better than the “god-is-good” and “god-is-love” memes do.